“You get the house, I’m taking the dog” – Pet Custody in Family Law Disputes
28th March 2018
By Pip Walker & Lisa Wagner
Ever wonder who would get the dog in circumstances of separation or divorce? Worried that if you break-up with your spouse you might never see your dog again? You are not alone.
Some people cannot imagine spending money on legal fees to argue in the Family Court the issue of who keeps a family dog, to others a dog is priceless.
The Full Court of the Family Court has determined several cases on this specific issue insodoing determining who retains the family dog in the process of settlement. While many people would say, like parenting matters relating to biological children, that the determination should be made with reference to the “best interests” of the dog, the Court has determined that animals are to be treated as property for the purposes of family law disputes.
So what does this mean for you? Were all those walks, vet visits, and dog brushing in vain?
Here are some examples of how the Court determined who would retain the dog:
1. Where the Husband kept the dog – Langley & Bramble  FamCA 437
The Husband secured Orders that he retain the dog despite the Wife arguing that the dog belonged to the child and that she believed that the dog was not residing with the husband but instead on a farm. The Wife supported her application by asserting that “the child does not return to her with dog hairs on her”. Watts J, the presiding Judge was not persuaded by the Wife’s assertions and ultimately accepted the Husband’s evidence that the dog was owned by him prior to the relationship and that the dog continued to reside with him and not on some undisclosed farm.
2. Where the Wife kept the dogs – Benford  FMCAfam 8
In this case the Wife sought to retain both of the parties’ dogs. By contrast, the Husband sought that the dogs be divided amongst them by each of them choosing one to retain. The Husband stated in his evidence, ‘Yes, well, we can’t come to an agreement on the valuation, so my counsel and I decided – or I decided – that the only real way out of it … is to divide them.’
The presiding Federal Magistrate, Federal Magistrate Roberts formed the view that the Husband had not strongly adhered to one position and as such, that the wife would keep the dogs.
3. Where the child kept the dog – In Jarvis & Weston  FamCA 1339
In this case the Father resisted the dog being moved from his home to the home of the Mother and child arguing that the Court had no jurisdiction and that he otherwise wanted more time to consider his position.
Justice Moore indicated that should the father wish to argue the Court’s jurisdiction that jurisdiction would be found, stating “[W]hether the issue falls to be considered under the accrued, associated, inherent, or parens patriae jurisdiction of the Court, it can be found should the need arise.”
Ultimately Her Honour concluded “The boy is attached to the dog. The dog is to go with the boy.”
Who will keep the family pet will turn upon the individual facts of your particular matter and it is clear from these decision that there is always be an element of Court discretion.
If you are looking for family law advice in relation to retaining a pet, or family law advice in general, Doolan Wagner Family Lawyers dedicated team works with their client’s and undertakes a genuine cost benefit analysis of each possible approach to their matter when providing their advice. If you wish to reach the best outcome for your particular matter having regard to your budget, we encourage you to contact us to discuss your matter today.
Doolan Wagner Family Lawyers is located in St Leonards on the North Shore of Sydney and are just a short walk from St Leonards Train Station and the Crows Nest shops. Doolan Wagner Family Lawyers service clients all over the Sydney Metropolitan and Northern Beaches areas. If you need assistance with a family law matter please don’t hesitate to call us on (02) 9437 0010 or email us on email@example.com
These posts are only intended as an overview or comment on current issues that may interest you and are not legal advice. If there are any matters that you would like us to advise you on, then please contact us.